[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# RE: VoterComment

- To: <bugtrack@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: RE: VoterComment
- From: "Jeff Hintz" <jhglobal@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 15:57:08 -0500
- Importance: Normal
- In-Reply-To: <PPECJKNKLDJLKJPKPPIOOEKECNAA.ken@dieboldes.com>

In Dupage County, IL, they only seen it once. Never in all their testing, only when they did their first initial zero report. After that, all reports were fine.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-bugtrack@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-bugtrack@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Ken Clark
> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 3:46 PM
> To: bugtrack@dieboldes.com
> Subject: RE: VoterComment

> > From: owner-bugtrack@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-bugtrack@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Steve Knecht
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 1:23 PM
> > And I can send the Alameda database.

> Obviously the Alameda database does not trigger the problem, or Jeff wouldn't be seeing it to. Do other databases exhibit the problem for Alameda County? Do they have a sequence of steps that reproduces the problem? If its "random" what is the rate of occurance? If they print twenty reports in a row will they see the problem three times, or can they print all day without seeing it?
> Ken

- References:
  - RE: VoterComment
    - From: "Ken Clark" <ken@dieboldes.com>

- Prev by Date: RE: VoterComment
- Next by Date: Re: VoterComment
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread