[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: GEMS 1-11-14 South Carolina Export

- To: <bugtrack@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: Re: GEMS 1-11-14 South Carolina Export
- From: "Nel Finberg" <nel@dieboldes.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 15:01:07 -0700
- References: <NDBBJBKEHMHBEPDMLKOLCEJEDBAA.ljdglobal@dieboldes.com>

Larry, could you please determine from Metamor the minimal certification requirements following a certified release in a particular thread, ie. 1-11-15 following 1-11-14? Perhaps we only need to submit release notes ...
Nel

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Larry Dix
> To: bugtrack@dieboldes.com
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 12:41 PM
> Subject: RE: GEMS 1-11-14 South Carolina Export

> Thanks for the reminder on the internal release numbers. Is that also true of the AVTS code?

> Larry J. Dix

> Vice President of Operations

> Global Election Systems

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-bugtrack@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-bugtrack@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Ken Clark
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 2:17 PM
> To: bugtrack@dieboldes.com
> Cc: Jeff Dean
> Subject: RE: GEMS 1-11-14 South Carolina Export

> Because the 4th digit is for internal releases. This was explained at length some time ago.

> And yes, it does put us in the position where we have to go back to Metamor. So would calling it 1.11.14.2. As will whatever new bugs are found in 1.11.15.

> Ken

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-bugtrack@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-bugtrack@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Larry Dix
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 11:44 AM
> To: bugtrack@dieboldes.com
> Cc: Jeff Dean
> Subject: RE: GEMS 1-11-14 South Carolina Export

> Why is it that this could not be in GEMS 1-11-14.xx. Given this type of release puts us in a position where we have to go back to Metamor, at an expense and test to get this release ITA certified. The only release that South Carolina will accept is the one that is ITA certified.

> Has this function been tested in the 1-17 series or does the same problem exist there also.

> Larry J. Dix

> Vice President of Operations

> Global Election Systems

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-bugtrack@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-bugtrack@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Dmitry Papushin
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 11:39 AM
> To: bugtrack@dieboldes.com
> Subject: Re: GEMS 1-11-14 South Carolina Export

> This is fixed and will be in GEMS-1-11-15.

> Dmitry

> ----- Original Message -----

> From: Nel Finberg

> To: Bug Track

> Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 7:55 PM

> Subject: GEMS 1-11-14 South Carolina Export

> Selecting South Carolina Export in the Export Id window and clicking on the OK button in GEMS 1-11-14 does not activate the South Carolina Export window, as it should.

> Nel

- References:
  - RE: GEMS 1-11-14 South Carolina Export
    - From: "Larry Dix" <ljdglobal@dieboldes.com>

- Prev by Date: RE: GEMS 1-11-14 South Carolina Export
- Next by Date: Ovals don't display for write-in candidates 1.18.2 (was RE: Multiple Cumulative ...)
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread