[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: GEMS 1-17-21: Card Cast Report: Incorrect party totals if multi-ballot per party.

- To: <bugtrack@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: Re: GEMS 1-17-21: Card Cast Report: Incorrect party totals if multi-ballot per party.
- From: "Dmitry Papushin" <dmitry@dieboldes.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 17:14:13 -0800
- References: <NFBBKABJOKDAFPKFEEKCKELMCJAA.sophia@dieboldes.com>

This is fixed and will be in GEMS-1-17-22.
Dmitry

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Sophia Lee
> To: Bug Track
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 10:54 AM
> Subject: GEMS 1-17-21: Card Cast Report: Incorrect party totals if multi-ballot per party.
> Required: Feb 28, 2002.
> By: San Luis Obispo
> CARDS CAST REPORT.
> PROBLEMS:
> 1. The Totals for the Voter Group 1 is incorrect if there are more than 1 ballot per party.
> Consider precinct CON 204-17:
> a. REP TOTAL should be 24.
> b. DEM TOTAL should be 12.
> c. LIB TOTAL should be 12. etc.
> 2. Very difficult to read the TOTALS in this report:
> Consider the following:
> a. "TOTAL REP" represents the total ballots for REP in Voter Group 2.
> b. "REP TOTAL" represents the totals ballots for REP in Voter Group 1.
> c. "TOTAL REP" and "REP TOTAL" will show if there are more than 1 ballot for REP in Voter Group 1 and Voter Group 2 respectively.
> d. TOTAL TOTAL" represents the totals ballots.
> Since revamping this report is too difficult at this time, I suggest putting in the lines above the Totals (shown in blue).
> If you didn't understand my explanation, please review the following illustration:

- References:
  - GEMS 1-17-21: Card Cast Report: Incorrect party totals if multi-ballot per party.
    - From: "Sophia Lee" <sophia@dieboldes.com>

- Prev by Date: VC id$ wrong on label in BS4.1.7
- Next by Date: JResultClient version 1: Displays write-in in the middle of the candidates.
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread