[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: Short names in long races AVTSNT-4-0-8

- To: <bugtrack@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: Re: Short names in long races AVTSNT-4-0-8
- From: "Steve Knecht" <skglobal@earthlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 19:07:50 -0700
- References: <00f901c131b9$fb751670$0e03a8c0@globalow6zn1fu>

Greg,
Could you translate this?
"The candidate blocks were larger when the candidates last name moved (truncated) to the second line than other can with shorter names whose second name did not move to the second line."
----- Original Message -----

> From: Greg Forsythe
> To: Bugtrack
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 6:12 PM
> Subject: Short names in long races AVTSNT-4-0-8
> GEMS-1-18-4 AVTSNT-4-0-8
> Two long races in one database made the use of 4 columns necessary. Vote for 6 with 24 candidates and the other vote for 9 and 36 candidates.
> The candidate blocks were larger when the candidates last name moved (truncated) to the second line than other can with shorter names whose second name did not move to the second line.
> To make the candidate blocks the same size I manually moved their second name in the RTF under Candidate in the Race Editor.
> Now all the candidates have the same spacing. However in the Summary, only the first name of the manually changed candidate appears. The other candidates names that wrapped to the second line automatically showed both the first name and the last.
> Database Attached
> Greg Forsythe
> Global Election Systems, Inc
> (416) 446-1383 office (416) 446-1425 fax
> (416) 464-3736 cell
> www.dieboldes.com

- Follow-Ups:
  - Re: Short names in long races AVTSNT-4-0-8
    - From: "Greg Forsythe" <gfglobal@earthlink.net>

- References:
  - Short names in long races AVTSNT-4-0-8
    - From: "Greg Forsythe" <gfglobal@earthlink.net>

- Prev by Date: Short names in long races AVTSNT-4-0-8
- Next by Date: Re: Short names in long races AVTSNT-4-0-8
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread