[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: Gems - Ballot On Demand

- To: "Ken Clark" <ken@dieboldes.com>, "Rcr List (E-mail)" <rcr@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: Re: Gems - Ballot On Demand
- From: "Steve Knecht" <skglobal@earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 19:50:37 -0800
- References: <NCBBIGGNCKBDKCCGPEOAKENCDCAA.ken@dieboldes.com>

Well said.

> Unofficial response:

> Disclaimers:

> - This doesn't make GEMS a BOD system. Treating it as such is a mistake.
> - This doesn't solve any of the problems associated with BOD printers not meeting Ian's ballot artwork specification. Using ballots that do not meet spec is a mistake.
> - Continuing to sell BOD when we do not have a workable BOD system is a mistake.
> - I didn't do it, no one saw me do it, you can't prove anything.
> Ken

- Follow-Ups:
  - Re: Gems - Ballot On Demand
    - From: "Nel Finberg" <nel@dieboldes.com>

- References:
  - RE: Gems - Ballot On Demand
    - From: "Ken Clark" <ken@dieboldes.com>

- Prev by Date: Re: Gems - Ballot On Demand
- Next by Date: Re: Gems - Ballot On Demand
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread