[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: GEMS 1-17-11-2 adding registered write-in candidate

- To: <support@gesn.com>
- Subject: Re: GEMS 1-17-11-2 adding registered write-in candidate
- From: "Nel Finberg" <nel@gesn.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 15:20:28 -0700
- References: <PPECJKNKLDJLKJPKPPIOEEMGCNAA.ken@gesn.com>

Absolutely nothing.
Nel

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ken Clark
> To: support@gesn.com
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 3:11 PM
> Subject: RE: GEMS 1-17-11-2 adding registered write-in candidate
> It should be possible to add support for this. What's it worth to you?
> Ken

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-support@gesn.com [mailto:owner-support@gesn.com]On Behalf Of Nel Finberg
> > Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 2:27 PM
> > To: support
> > Subject: GEMS 1-17-11-2 adding registered write-in candidate

> > Is there any reason why an endorsement party cannot be selected when adding a registered write-in candidate?

> > Nel

- Follow-Ups:
  - Re: GEMS 1-17-11-2 adding registered write-in candidate
    - From: "Tari Runyan" <trglobal@earthlink.net>

- References:
  - RE: GEMS 1-17-11-2 adding registered write-in candidate
    - From: "Ken Clark" <ken@gesn.com>

- Prev by Date: RE: GEMS 1-17-11-2 adding registered write-in candidate
- Next by Date: Re: GEMS 1-17-11-2 adding registered write-in candidate
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread