[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: VoterComment

- To: <bugtrack@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: Re: VoterComment
- From: "Tari Runyan" <trglobal@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 19:13:43 -0600
- References: <002501c0cc37$63b07470$0903a8c0@Jeff> <021501c0dcd1$923423a0$1404a8c0@dieboldes.com>

    I printed it both ways on my hp5 and did not get a watermark in either
    case. - but I have never gotten one on this printer.
    Sorry I couldn't be of more help
    Tari
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Talbot Iredale" <tiredale@dieboldes.com>
    To: <bugtrack@dieboldes.com>
    Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 5:57 PM
    Subject: Re: VoterComment

    > I think I have fixed this problem but without a printer there is no way to
    > confirm this.
    >
    > If the problem is what I think it is then the "watermark" should only
    appear
    > if you print directly from the SummaryReportDlg screen. If you preview the
    > report and then print it from the preview screen the "watermark" should
    not
    > occur.  Can anyone confirm that this is the case?
    >
    > Tab
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: "Jeff Hintz" <jhglobal@earthlink.net>
    > To: "Bugs List (E-mail)" <bugtrack@dieboldes.com>
    > Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 1:52 PM
    > Subject: FW: VoterComment
    >
    >
    > > Tom Schuhler from GBS sent me this e-mail below.  They were using GEMS
    > > 1.17.7 and a HP 4000 printer.  I asked him if he knew what the printer
    > > properties were set at, but could not tell me.  Unfortunately, I do not
    > have
    > > a HP 4000 printer to try and duplicate this problem.  I told him, that
    it
    > > possibly was something set within the printer properties and not coming
    > from
    > > GEMS.  Has anyone else seen this problem, or something similar???
    > >
    > > Thanks,
    > >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: Tom Schuhler [mailto:schuhler@ivcc.edu]
    > > Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 11:38 AM
    > > To: jhglobal@earthlink.net
    > > Cc: jvold@gbsvote.net
    > > Subject: VoterComment
    > >
    > >
    > > Jeff,
    > >
    > > On Election Night, 4/3/01, at DuPage County, Illinios, the text
    > > "VoterComment" printed in the center of each page of the first GEMS
    > Election
    > > Summary Report that was printed.  The content of this report appeared to
    > be
    > > correct other than the fact that "VoterComment" was printed in the
    center
    > of
    > > the each page overlaying whatever happened to be in the center of that
    > page.
    > > This report was printed before any memory cards were uploaded.
    > >
    > > When the final GEMS Election Summary Report was printed after all memory
    > > cards were uploaded, the landscape option for the report was selected.
    > The
    > > text "VoterComment" did NOT appear on the final report.  It is also
    > > important to note that we did not notice this text on any GEMS Election
    > > Summary Reports we printed during DuPage pre-election testing prior to
    > > 4/3/01.
    > >
    > > "VoterComment" is a field in the ChallengeVoter Table of the GEMS
    > database.
    > > I'm not sure what this field or table is used for.
    > >
    > > Do you have any idea why we saw "VoterComment"?  (Cathi Smothers of
    Global
    > > was at DuPage on Election Night.  I believe she saw the problem report
    but
    > > did not know the cause.  However, she might be able to provide
    additional
    > > details.)
    > >
    > > Thanks,
    > >
    > > Tom Schuhler
    > >
    >

- Follow-Ups:
  - RE: VoterComment
    - From: "Ian S. Piper" <ian@dieboldes.com>

- References:
  - Re: VoterComment
    - From: "Talbot Iredale" <tiredale@dieboldes.com>

- Prev by Date: Re: Disapearing check box in Print Artwork
- Next by Date: RE: VoterComment
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread