[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: JResult Client Modification

- To: <rcr@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: Re: JResult Client Modification
- From: "Greg Forsythe" <gfglobal@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 11:27:24 -0400
- Organization: Global Election Systems, Inc
- References: <005101bfcf5e$3e6a69e0$ea011a3f@oemcomputer> <04d901bfcfc2$92c12600$5e03a8c0@globalelection.com>

In all the elections I have been at, the most important factor in finishing the election is identifying the unreported polls/precincts and tracking them down. Perhaps a set percentage of polls/precincts could be listed, determined by the GEMS manager.
This looks like an excellent feature for all GEMS customers.
Greg

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ian Piper
> To: rcr@dieboldes.com
> Sent: June 6, 2000 10:21 AM
> Subject: Re: JResult Client Modification
> Tell them to shop for the changes elsewhere.

> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Barry Herron
> > To: rcr@dieboldes.com
> > Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 9:23 PM
> > Subject: Re: JResult Client Modification
> > Hamilton County would not approve a $20,000 program enhancement, but would probably approve a $2,000 to $2,500 charge. If we advertise the enhancement or module (enhancements if applicable to all users are normally not charged for) is available I would doubt that we would not have several counties desiring such for a charge of $2,000 to $2,500. Several counties have asked for the information to be displayed, but no one has taken the inquiry seriously until Hamilton County'd request of Cathi.
> > Barry

> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ken Clark <ken@dieboldes.com>
> > > To: rcr@dieboldes.com <rcr@dieboldes.com>
> > > Date: Monday, June 05, 2000 4:51 PM
> > > Subject: RE: JResult Client Modification

> > > > I feel it is in our best interest to notify them of an estimated charge. This payment for a programming change is such a novel idea, maybe we could see more of this.

> > > I have talked to Tab about this at length, since indeed this is without a lot of precedence. We estimate this feature to cost in the neighbourhood of $20k. It will take roughly two weeks to implement. The election date is Aug 3, so we'd need to get a contract in place in short order to have it done in time for testing and deployment.

> > > I know there are other accounts that would want this feature, or something similar; it would be worth seeing if the cost might be shared with other accounts. We don't really have a sales mechanism in place for that to happen right now, but as you say this is fairly novel.

> > > Ken

- References:
  - Re: JResult Client Modification
    - From: "Barry Herron" <bhglobal@earthlink.net>
  - Re: JResult Client Modification
    - From: "Ian Piper" <ian@dieboldes.com>

- Prev by Date: Re: JResult Client Modification
- Next by Date: Re: JResult Client Modification
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread