[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# RE: Move Magnify Option to Voter Control

- To: <rcr@gesn.com>
- Subject: RE: Move Magnify Option to Voter Control
- From: "Robert Pickett" <robertp@gesn.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 16:23:13 -0700
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <00fe01c1fd29$f256dd30$2304a8c0@kclark>

Using the spyrus, as it is currently programmed, to create a provisional/challenged voter card at the precinct level is a stop gap measure that can work in a controlled demonstration but not in the uncontrolled environment of a precinct with pollworkers. I have been using an AccuVote Ballot in the precincts for provisional ballots, however I am getting presure from the State of Virginia and the City of Norfolk to come up with an electronic solution. What is the time frame for coming up with a provisional ballot solution that is simple and easy for the pollworker? The State of Georgia is going to expect an electronic solution not a paper one.
Robert Pickett

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rcr@gesn.com [mailto:owner-rcr@gesn.com]On Behalf Of Ken Clark
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 3:35 PM
> To: rcr@gesn.com
> Subject: RE: Move Magnify Option to Voter Control

> There isn’t any plan/design in place right now for provisional/challenge ballots beyond what currently exists. We know this area needs work. The provisional/challenge ballot project won’t be (isn’t) related to the ballot work Ataa is currently working on.

> Ken

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rcr@gesn.com [mailto:owner-rcr@gesn.com] On Behalf Of Lesley Thompson
> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 12:06 PM
> To: rcr@gesn.com
> Subject: Re: Move Magnify Option to Voter Control

> Will these ballot station options also include the option for the PROVISIONAL or CHALLENGE ballot, will they be with the card encoder module, or something else?

> Les

> > ----- Original Message -----

> > From: Josh Gardner

> > To: rcr@gesn.com

> > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 11:57 AM

> > Subject: RE: Move Magnify Option to Voter Control

> > Please note that the archives have been successfully repaired.

> > Josh.

> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-rcr@gesn.com [mailto:owner-rcr@gesn.com]On Behalf Of Ken Clark
> > > Sent: May 14, 2002 10:52
> > > To: rcr@gesn.com
> > > Subject: RE: Move Magnify Option to Voter Control

> > > See attached. I can’t seem to find this email in the archives – apologies if you tried to look this up first. I have asked Josh to look into that. Ataa is working on the infrastructure to support a back button to instructions, language, and party. Magnify should be “easy” after that work is complete.

> > > Ken

> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-rcr@gesn.com [mailto:owner-rcr@gesn.com] On Behalf Of Steve Knecht
> > > Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 7:13 PM
> > > To: rcr@gesn.com
> > > Subject: Move Magnify Option to Voter Control

> > > Any chance of allowing the Voter the option of the magnify button (in addition to the pollworker option). Anyone see any big downside to it? It is a consistent theme I hear from everyone that it makes sense to allow the voter an option for that as well.

> > > Steve Knecht
> > > Diebold Election Systems
> > > 415-893-9941 office 415-893-9951 fax
> > > 415-225-6591 cell

- References:
  - RE: Move Magnify Option to Voter Control
    - From: "Ken Clark" <ken@dieboldes.com>

- Prev by Date: RE: Move Magnify Option to Voter Control
- Next by Date: Provisional ballots (was RE: Move Magnify Option to Voter Control )
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread