[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: Red as a second colour

- To: "Ian S. Piper" <ian@dieboldes.com>, <ken@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: Re: Red as a second colour
- From: "Nel Finberg" <nel@dieboldes.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 18:36:44 -0000
- Cc: "Greg Forsythe" <jgforsyt@netcom.ca>, <Rcr@dieboldes.com>

    Sorry to throw in my two bits here, but I think Greg originally requested
    that GEMS allow text components be made red in addition to ovals, so that
    red oval artwork separations incorporate these red text components.
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Ian S. Piper <ian@dieboldes.com>
    To: ken@dieboldes.com <ken@dieboldes.com>
    Cc: Greg Forsythe <jgforsyt@netcom.ca>; Rcr@dieboldes.com <Rcr@dieboldes.com>
    Date: Saturday, February 06, 1999 1:11 AM
    Subject: Re: Red as a second colour

    >Ken Clark wrote:
    >
    >> > > I've never seen a red oval printout, but I think what Greg is
    >> > > looking for is a
    >> > > way to take a separate red oval printout (which is just a
    >> > > printout of ovals, no
    >> > > text I guess) and have some identification on that oval printout
    >> > > which allows
    >> > > the print shop to match it to the actual ballot layout text.
    >> >
    >> > This feature will be in the next version of GEMS.  Its a 5 minute
    change.
    >> > Sorry for the confusion Greg.
    >>
    >> I spoke too fast (and I have put away the clue hammer).
    >>
    >> Whitman informs me that we print the card identification text outside the
    >> cut marks on the oval plate already, so printers have the means to match
    up
    >> the plates.  Greg just put that in the rcr to throw me (us) off...
    >>
    >> Ken
    >
    >Hi Greg:
    >
    >If the id is printed on the red oval template, then why did you post the
    rcr?
    >
    >Ian
    >

- Prev by Date: Re: Red as a second colour
- Next by Date: Piedmont Election
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread