[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# RE: Gems 1-18-18 PA cross endorsement

- To: <rcr@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: RE: Gems 1-18-18 PA cross endorsement
- From: "Ken Clark" <ken@dieboldes.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 09:32:52 -0800
- Importance: Normal
- In-Reply-To: <GFEPLGKCBIMFJMFPCGPEKEACCIAA.cacglobal@earthlink.net>

Thanks for getting back Jane. I might have phrased the question poorly. What are the written PA statues regarding cross endorsement for paper ballots? Please fax the relevant sections to Vancouver.
Ken

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rcr@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-rcr@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Cathy Colgan
> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:10 AM
> To: rcr@dieboldes.com
> Subject: RE: Gems 1-18-18 PA cross endorsement
> According to the SOS currently they do not have any written statues on Electronic Voting. They have always listed a dual party candidate only once on the paper ballot. Therefore, this is how they want it on the TS.
> Thanks,
> Jane

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-rcr@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-rcr@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Ken Clark
> > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 5:16 PM
> > To: rcr@dieboldes.com
> > Subject: RE: Gems 1-18-18 PA cross endorsement
> > We were wondering if anyone actually did it that way -- we were hoping not. You are right it seems confusing to me too.
> > The duplicate ArtSeq is an interesting interface suggestion. You could even imagine some duplicated and some not. We'll do that or something along those lines.
> > As a point of curiosity, is doing it this way actually a statute, or just "they way they've always done it". If its the former, please forward the section up to Vancouver.
> > Ken

> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-rcr@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-rcr@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Jane Barth
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:59 PM
> > > To: rcr@dieboldes.com
> > > Subject: Gems 1-18-18 PA cross endorsement
> > > Theoretically the cross endorsement works appropriately. I noticed in VTS, if you want the parties listed next to the candidate, the candidate would be listed each time for a party affiliation as GEMS does. Also in VTS, if you want the candidate to appear only once on the ballot, no party affiliation appears next to the candidate. Which seems confusing, what party would the candidate be affiliated with?
> > > The state of PA expects the candidate to be listed only once in the race with a dual party endorsement.
> > > Gems c urrently shows:
> > > John Doe (Dem)
> > > John Doe (Rep)
> > > The dual party option would show:
> > > John Doe (Dem/Rep)
> > > During straight party voting and dual party option, whether Dem or Rep is voted John Doe would receive a vote. Is it possibly to give the endorsed candidate the same ARTSQ identifier and then append the party name after the candidate?
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jane

- References:
  - RE: Gems 1-18-18 PA cross endorsement
    - From: "Cathy Colgan" <cacglobal@earthlink.net>

- Prev by Date: RE: Gems 1-18-18 PA cross endorsement
- Next by Date: VIBS Ballot Review Process
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread