[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# RE: GEMS 1-17-11 candidate withrawal

- To: <support@gesn.com>
- Subject: RE: GEMS 1-17-11 candidate withrawal
- From: "Ken Clark" <ken@gesn.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 14:44:52 -0600
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <ODEFIJCCLAAIGHHAOEJIGEHPCAAA.nfglobal@earthlink.net>

    > From: owner-support@gesn.com [mailto:owner-support@gesn.com]On Behalf Of
    > Nel Finberg
    > Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 2:25 PM
    >
    > Is the candidate Withdaw flag just intended for  AccuVote-OS ballots?  Or
    > does the same rationale apply to AccuVote-TS ballots also?

    It applies to AccuVote-OS ballots as well.  There are subtle issues here
    though.  I would suggest not tugging on that thread for the purposes of 1.17
    docs.

    > I would also
    > like to confirm the logic:  the candidate is placed on
    > AccuVote-OS reports,
    > even if the Withdraw flag was selected before programming memory
    > cards, but
    > the candidate does not appear on GEMS reports.

    It depends on the AVOS version.  1.94x AVOS and later won't have it on the
    tape if the memory card is downloaded after the candidate is withdrawn.
    They will also not reject races overvoted with a withdrawn candidate.
    Earlier versions will display the word "WITHDRAWN" as the candidate name on
    reports and treat it the same as any other candidate.  If the memory card is
    downloaded before the candidate is withdrawn, then the AVOS will count it,
    but GEMS will drop those votes on the floor at upload.  Withdrawn candidates
    do not appear on GEMS reports.

    Ken

- References:
  - GEMS 1-17-11 candidate withrawal
    - From: "Nel Finberg" <nfglobal@earthlink.net>

- Prev by Date: Adkins memory cards.
- Next by Date: Server Timeout (was RE: Phone numbers)
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread