[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# RE: HELP!! Re: State of Texas report request

- To: <support@gesn.com>
- Subject: RE: HELP!! Re: State of Texas report request
- From: "Cathy Colgan" <cacglobal@earthlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 15:56:16 -0600
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <00e001c17920$67cb0fc0$0a04a8c0@gesn.com>

that's all i need to know - thank you for responding

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-support@gesn.com [mailto:owner-support@gesn.com]On Behalf Of Nel Finberg
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:54 PM
> To: support@gesn.com
> Subject: Re: HELP!! Re: State of Texas report request
> Sorting precincts by votes cast on the SOVC? I wouldn't think that we can do that at present.
> Nel

> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Cathy Colgan
> > To: support@gesn.com
> > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:39 PM
> > Subject: RE: HELP!! Re: State of Texas report request
> > Thank you for responding
> > travis is talking about a total of 5 votes cast (times counted) any suggestions?

> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-support@gesn.com [mailto:owner-support@gesn.com]On Behalf Of Nel Finberg
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:21 PM
> > > To: support@gesn.com
> > > Subject: Re: HELP!! Re: State of Texas report request
> > > I can only see this being implemented in terms of two mutually exclusive districts, the union of which represent the entire jurisdiction, where the first district includes all precincts with 5 or more registered voters and the second district including all precincts with less than 5 registered voters. Define both of these districts within a district category, then issue the SOVC report for the district category, selecting the 'I' and 'D' values in the District column corresponding to the district category.
> > > This registration-based district would have to be created after entering the last registration amounts prior to election day, but prior to setting the election status to 'Set for Election'.
> > > Nel

> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Jane Barth
> > > > To: support@gesn.com
> > > > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:01 PM
> > > > Subject: HELP!! Re: State of Texas report request
> > > > Can anyone give some insight on this matter? Gail Fisher is anxiously
> > > > awaiting our call and we don't want to make assumptions.
> > > > Thank You,
> > > > Jane
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Cathy Colgan <cacglobal@earthlink.net>
> > > > To: <support@gesn.com>
> > > > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:00 PM
> > > > Subject: RE: State of Texas report request
> > > > > I would have submitted this to an RCR, however after talking with Rodney
> > > > > this morning, he thought that we have done this OR something similar in
> > > > the
> > > > > past.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Cathy
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: owner-support@gesn.com [mailto:owner-support@gesn.com]On Behalf Of
> > > > > Cathy Colgan
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:13 PM
> > > > > To: Support
> > > > > Subject: State of Texas report request
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Jurisdiction: State of Texas
> > > > > Date requested: Nov. 29, 2001
> > > > > Date required: Sales opportunity
> > > > >
> > > > > 1) For Canvassing purpose: A SOVC precinct report that list all precincts
> > > > > with 5 voters or more and than a break in the report that list the
> > > > precincts
> > > > > with 4 or less voters.
> > > > >
> > > > > 2) For Press purposes: A Precinct Summary report that omits precincts with
> > > > 4
> > > > > or less voters without having to select each individual precinct.
> > > > >
> > > > > Would we create separate TX reports or add more options to our reporting
> > > > > features.
> > > > >
> > > > > According to Travis, these are required by law.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Cathy
> > > > >
> > > > >

- References:
  - Re: HELP!! Re: State of Texas report request
    - From: "Nel Finberg" <nel@gesn.com>

- Prev by Date: Re: HELP!! Re: State of Texas report request
- Next by Date: Re: ABasic-1-18-8
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread