[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# RE: GEMS 1.17.23 Election Summary Report/turnout in races with number to vote for>1

- To: <support@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: RE: GEMS 1.17.23 Election Summary Report/turnout in races with number to vote for>1
- From: "Greg Forsythe" <gregf@dieboldes.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 10:39:37 -0400
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <04bf01c26020$d53b79e0$1702af0a@dieboldes.com>

If Ballots Cast is the same as Times Counted it might be more easily understood.
Greg

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-support@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-support@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Talbot Iredale
> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 5:09 PM
> To: support@dieboldes.com
> Subject: Re: GEMS 1.17.23 Election Summary Report/turnout in races with number to vote for>1
> Nel,
> I do not think this would make any sense and unless there is a specific account that has requested this I do not think we should change this.
> Tab
> Talbot Iredale, P.Eng.
> Sofware Development Manager
> Diebold Election Systems
> Phone (604) 261-6313
> Fax (604) 261-9226

> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Nel Finberg
> > To: support
> > Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 6:04 PM
> > Subject: GEMS 1.17.23 Election Summary Report/turnout in races with number to vote for>1
> > Turnout values for total votes, undervotes, and write-ins are currently expressed on the Election Summary report in terms of times counted for the race. In general terms, it may make more sense to divide these values by the number to vote for. Any thoughts on this?
> > Nel

- References:
  - Re: GEMS 1.17.23 Election Summary Report/turnout in races with number to vote for>1
    - From: "Talbot Iredale" <tiredale@dieboldes.com>

- Prev by Date: RE: GEMS 1.17.22 ps file: single quote straight to hooked-examples
- Next by Date: Re: Warehouse Cart
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread