[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: 1.94w supports 10 parties in Ca March 2002 primary

- To: <support@gesn.com>
- Subject: Re: 1.94w supports 10 parties in Ca March 2002 primary
- From: "Steve Knecht" <skglobal@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 18:53:47 -0800
- References: <002201c181aa$09f4b4e0$0203a8c0@ges001> <004301c181b2$fca3ce80$1404a8c0@gesn.com>

Tab, CA. has 8 parties, plus "decline to state Votergroup2" usage for DEM and Rep, but that does not cause a 10th party. 8<10. Why do we need to changes ROMS?

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Talbot Iredale
> To: support@gesn.com
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 11:43 AM
> Subject: Re: 1.94w supports 10 parties in Ca March 2002 primary
> Yes.

> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Tari Runyan
> > To: Support
> > Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 10:39 AM
> > Subject: 1.94w supports 10 parties in Ca March 2002 primary
> > Just to clarify - Will we need to change roms in all California accounts to get thru the March 2002 primary?
> > thank you
> > Tari Runyan

- Follow-Ups:
  - Re: 1.94w supports 10 parties in Ca March 2002 primary
    - From: "Talbot Iredale" <tiredale@gesn.com>

- References:
  - 1.94w supports 10 parties in Ca March 2002 primary
    - From: "Tari Runyan" <trglobal@earthlink.net>
  - Re: 1.94w supports 10 parties in Ca March 2002 primary
    - From: "Talbot Iredale" <tiredale@gesn.com>

- Prev by Date: Re: Election Results recovery when both PCMCIA & AVTS unit fail
- Next by Date: Re: Election Results recovery when both PCMCIA & AVTS unit fail
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread