[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# RE: Audio in the Summary Screen

- To: <support@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: RE: Audio in the Summary Screen
- From: "Sophia Lee" <sophia@dieboldes.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 09:07:04 -0800
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <LGEBJLEPICBGOLMNFIKCGEEHCFAA.spdiebold@earthlink.net>

    Some of LA's ballots for the November 2002 were 15 or more TS pages.  It
    took at least 1/2 hour to vote on a VIBS ballot.  I also vote "NO
    THANKS".

    -----Original Message-----
    From: owner-support@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-support@dieboldes.com]
    On Behalf Of Sue Page
    Sent: November 24, 2002 4:27 PM
    To: support@dieboldes.com
    Subject: RE: Audio in the Summary Screen

    I again express my concerns about allowing our upgrades to be customer
    driven.  As we all know, the customer often doesn't know what they want,
    or
    what is best for them.  I think we need to do more analysis before we
    add
    features.  As Steve points out  - this upgrade adds complexity to our
    product - making it slower, and with more opportunities for failure. Is
    that
    the direction we want to take?

    Are we building a Cadillac - that our customers can't afford to purchase
    or
    upkeep?  I vote for building a really nice Honda instead.
    Sue

    -----Original Message-----
    From: owner-support@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-support@dieboldes.com]On
    Behalf Of Steve Knecht
    Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 2:42 PM
    To: support@dieboldes.com
    Subject: RE: Audio in the Summary Screen

    It already takes a half hour or so to work through the CA. ballot, if
    you
    add a summary on the ballot after each race is confirmed during the
    process,
    it seems to me you'll add more complexity for those folks who want to
    skip
    the summary, as most will.  I'm a "no" vote on this.

    -----Original Message-----
    From: owner-support@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-support@dieboldes.com]On
    Behalf Of Ken
    Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:20 AM
    To: support@dieboldes.com
    Subject: RE: Audio in the Summary Screen

    Interesting.  How does it work?

    Ken

    -----Original Message-----
    From: owner-support@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-support@dieboldes.com]
    On Behalf Of Talbot Iredale
    Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 8:36 AM
    To: support@dieboldes.com
    Subject: Re: Audio in the Summary Screen

    Greg,

        We will be working on adding this to the next major release of
    ballot
    station.

    Tab

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Greg Forsythe" <gregf@dieboldes.com>
    To: "Support" <support@dieboldes.com>
    Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 7:19 PM
    Subject: Audio in the Summary Screen

    > We have a Summary Screen for those with vision.  Why do we not have
    the
    > equivalent audio screen for those who do not have vision?
    >
    > Why do we not have an Audio Summary screen?
    >
    > Greg Forsythe
    > Diebold Election Systems Inc.
    > Phone:  (416) 446-1383
    > Fax:  (416) 446-1425
    > Cell:  (416) 464-3736
    >
    >

- References:
  - RE: Audio in the Summary Screen
    - From: "Sue Page" <spdiebold@earthlink.net>

- Prev by Date: RE: Audio in the Summary Screen
- Next by Date: RE: City's original vote totals flawed
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread