[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# RE: GEMS 1.16.1 Voter Group editor Row/Col

- To: <bugtrack@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: RE: GEMS 1.16.1 Voter Group editor Row/Col
- From: "Ken Clark" <ken@dieboldes.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 16:04:32 -0500
- Importance: Normal
- In-Reply-To: <NCBBIGGNCKBDKCCGPEOAGEBNDHAA.ken@dieboldes.com>

Tab, does the change you made regarding this clobber the layout, or just prevent add/remove/edit after cards are set as layed out?
Ken

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-bugtrack@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-bugtrack@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Ken Clark
> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2000 5:12 PM
> To: bugtrack@dieboldes.com
> Subject: RE: GEMS 1.16.1 Voter Group editor Row/Col

> > A Force Re-Layout check box should be provided in the Voter Group Editor in case revision of Row/Col values affects voting oval placement once ballots have been layed out.

> Actually, it should clobber the layout period; no need for a force checkbox. Its like deleting a candidate.

> I have a feeling that this is going to be too hard to do in practice, and that users will just need to know better. We'll see.

> Ken

- Follow-Ups:
  - Re: GEMS 1.16.1 Voter Group editor Row/Col
    - From: "Talbot Iredale" <tiredale@dieboldes.com>

- Prev by Date: Re: AVTS-3.13.1
- Next by Date: Re: GEMS 1.16.1 Voter Group editor Row/Col
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread