[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# RE: Separate Ovals - Thick Ovals

- To: <rcr@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: RE: Separate Ovals - Thick Ovals
- From: "Tyler Links" <tyler@dieboldes.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 11:16:32 -0600
- Importance: Normal
- In-Reply-To: <002801c04b2d$c595bc30$c350149a@greg>

It seems that the customers in question were not properly trained.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rcr@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-rcr@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Greg Forsythe
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 9:49 AM
To: Request for Change
Subject: Separate Ovals - Thick Ovals

Please have thick ovals checked as a default when checking separate ovals. Second Request.

The City of Hamilton has separate ovals printed in red but are not thick, the very purpose they were printed in red. Very difficult to see. They are using 160 Accu-Votes Monday with these thin red ovals.

This is about the fifth election where this mistake has happened. Last year it was Langford, B.C.

Greg Forsythe
Global Election Systems, Inc
24 Hirondelle Place,
Toronto, Ontario M3A 1V8
Phone (416) 446-1383
Fax (416) 446-1425
gfglobal@earthlink.net www.dieboldes.com

- Follow-Ups:
  - Re: Separate Ovals - Thick Ovals
    - From: "Greg Forsythe" <gfglobal@earthlink.net>
  - Re: Separate Ovals - Thick Ovals
    - From: "Donald W. Biszmaier" <dbglobal@earthlink.net>

- References:
  - Separate Ovals - Thick Ovals
    - From: "Greg Forsythe" <gfglobal@earthlink.net>

- Prev by Date: Re: Separate Ovals - Thick Ovals
- Next by Date: Re: Separate Ovals - Thick Ovals
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread