[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Write-in consolidation -- requirements

- To: <support@gesn.com>
- Subject: Write-in consolidation -- requirements
- From: "Ken Clark" <ken@gesn.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 12:54:03 -0700
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <PPECJKNKLDJLKJPKPPIOMEMCCNAA.ken@gesn.com>

> From: owner-rcr@gesn.com [mailto:owner-rcr@gesn.com]On Behalf Of Ken Clark
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 12:44 PM

> See thread started by rodney subject "write-ins" started Fri 3/2/2001 8:31 AM. Looks like we are going to have to have some kind of write-in reconciliation dialog at some point. No date has been set for this, though.

Quick support-list follow up to this. Project managers for accounts should start thinking/inquiring about the requirements for write-in processing. Both GEMS and VTS before it have limped along without doing much in the way of write-in processing. This either implies that there are not huge demand for write-in reporting, or accounts are doing the reporting on their own in some way.

We need to know, in detail, how accounts currently process write-ins, and what the requirements are for reporting are. For example, is it necessary in all or some accounts to report write-ins at the precinct level, or are summary reports sufficient? Are the reporting requirements different for the losers, or are all write-ins treated equally? There are many other details. Obviously the requirements are going to vary widely by region.

I had posted a request in the previous write-in thread on the details of how write-ins are to be processed. There wasn't any response. There probably won't be a lot of code written without one.

Ken

- Follow-Ups:
  - Re: Write-in consolidation -- requirements
    - From: "Tari Runyan" <trglobal@earthlink.net>

- Prev by Date: Re: Platte County,MO - Time Outs on Ports during uploads
- Next by Date: Re: Write-in consolidation -- requirements
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread