[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# RE: Accu-Vote Verion 2 (was Accu-Vote Beta Release 1.95d)

- To: "Support" <support@gesn.com>
- Subject: RE: Accu-Vote Verion 2 (was Accu-Vote Beta Release 1.95d)
- From: "Ken Clark" <ken@gesn.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 14:14:07 -0600
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <006d01be55f8$597d8040$5e03a8c0@piper.globalelection.com>

> > If they have a stable firmware solution using the smaller clock chips, RAM chips and ROM ICs, then there would be no need to upgrade those components.

> > Ian

The issue is not stability, it is new features. 1.94latest will be the most stable firmware we have for some time. For people who require the new features, it seems obvious that they need to pay for that.

Ian, it would probably be a good idea to let Larry know the costs involved so that a price scheme can be worked out in advance of the 2.0 release, rather than after.

Ken

- Follow-Ups:
  - Accu-Vote Verion 2 (was Accu-Vote Beta Release 1.95d)
    - From: "Sophia Lee" <sophia@gesn.com>

- References:
  - Re: Accu-Vote Verion 2 (was Accu-Vote Beta Release 1.95d)
    - From: "Ian S. Piper" <ian@gesn.com>

- Prev by Date: Re: Accu-Vote Verion 2 (was Accu-Vote Beta Release 1.95d)
- Next by Date: Accu-Vote Verion 2 (was Accu-Vote Beta Release 1.95d)
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread