[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# RE: Washoe County Firmware Revision level

- To: <support@gesn.com>
- Subject: RE: Washoe County Firmware Revision level
- From: "Larry Dix" <ljdglobal@gesn.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 17:44:49 -0500
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <009a01bfb9c3$4943bac0$a0f0fc9e@default>

    What is the final answer on the firmware.  I would like to update this data,
    but want good accurate data.

    Larry J. Dix
    Global Election Systems
    (972)-542-6000

    -----Original Message-----
    From: owner-support@gesn.com [mailto:owner-support@gesn.com]On Behalf Of
    Steve Knecht
    Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2000 9:32 AM
    To: support@gesn.com
    Subject: Re: Washoe County Firmware Revision level

    Why do you say this?
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: <Fkglobal@aol.com>
    To: <support@gesn.com>
    Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2000 7:05 AM
    Subject: Re: Washoe County Firmware Revision level

    > Ian -
    >
    > I think it would be best to send their new units with 1.94w.
    >
    > Thanks
    >
    > - Frank
    >

- Follow-Ups:
  - Re: Washoe County Firmware Revision level
    - From: "Steve Knecht" <skglobal@earthlink.net>

- References:
  - Re: Washoe County Firmware Revision level
    - From: "Steve Knecht" <skglobal@earthlink.net>

- Prev by Date: Re: Washoe County Firmware Revision level
- Next by Date: Re: Washoe County Firmware Revision level
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread