[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# RE: modems ???in AVOS

- To: <support@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: RE: modems ???in AVOS
- From: "Sue Page" <spdiebold@earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 08:29:49 -0400
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <006201c24a45$e79dc2f0$529db3d1@diebold001>

Maryland is also interested in digital or wireless solution. Montgomery County, with 2638 units and 227 precincts, decided not to modem in results because they would have been required to run analog lines in most of their precinct locations.
Sue

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-support@gesn.com [mailto:owner-support@gesn.com]On Behalf Of Tari Runyan
> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 9:39 PM
> To: Support
> Subject: modems ???in AVOS
> from El Paso Co
> >
> > 2. Accuvote Modems. Is there a newer, more advanced, possibly
> > digital-able modem that can be put in the Accuvotes? Many of our polling
> > places have digital phone signals that as you know, the Accuvote cannot
> > handle. More and more sites are unable to modem in their results.
> > Furthermore, is there any new devices that other counties may be using as a
> > workaround? Such as a wireless modem connected to a cell phone or PDA? I'm
> > very interested in upgrading our Accuvote modems to handle these newer
> > situations to increase our ability to modem in results.
> any info appreciated
> Thanks
> Tari

- Follow-Ups:
  - RE: modems ???in AVOS
    - From: "Ian S. Piper" <ian@dieboldes.com>
  - RE: modems ???in AVOS
    - From: "Steve Knecht" <stevek@dieboldes.com>

- References:
  - modems ???in AVOS
    - From: "Tari Runyan" <tarir@dieboldes.com>

- Prev by Date: RE: Pollworker Manuals
- Next by Date: RE: modems ???in AVOS
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread