[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: ability to clear one precinct in a multiprecinct vote center

- To: "rcr" <rcr@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: Re: ability to clear one precinct in a multiprecinct vote center
- From: "Tari Runyan" <tprunyan@techline.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 10:45:01 -0800

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Ken Clark <ken@dieboldes.com>
    To: tari@dieboldes.com <tari@dieboldes.com>
    Date: Tuesday, March 14, 2000 1:52 PM
    Subject: RE: BOUNCE rcr@dieboldes.com: Non-member submission from ["Tari Runyan"
    <tprunyan@techline.com>]

    >Hey Tari.  Your mail bounced because tprunyan@techline is not subscribed to
    >the rcr list.  There are a couple of solutions.  One is to subscribe
    >yourself using techline.  You could also try setting the mail address on
    >your mailer to trglobal@earthlink.net even for your techline account.  I am
    >not sure if that will work though.
    >
    >Ken
    >
    >> -----Original Message-----
    >> From: owner-rcr@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-rcr@dieboldes.com]
    >> Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2000 3:49 PM
    >> To: owner-rcr@dieboldes.com
    >> Subject: BOUNCE rcr@dieboldes.com: Non-member submission from ["Tari Runyan"
    >> <tprunyan@techline.com>]
    >>
    >>
    >> >From ken@ns.dieboldes.com  Tue Mar 14 13:49:19 2000
    >> Received: from mx1.techline.com (mx1.techline.com [204.201.36.16])
    >> by ns.dieboldes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA31136
    >> for <rcr@dieboldes.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 13:49:19 -0800
    >> Received: from runyan (ip256.a0net.ips.techline.com [204.203.20.8])
    >> by mx1.techline.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id NAA25104
    >> for <rcr@dieboldes.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 13:36:56 -0800
    >> Message-ID: <001501bf8dfd$2a1d0350$0814cbcc@runyan>
    >> From: "Tari Runyan" <tprunyan@techline.com>
    >> To: <rcr@dieboldes.com>
    >> Subject: Re: ability to clear one precinct in a multiprecinct vote center
    >> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 13:35:03 -0800
    >> MIME-Version: 1.0
    >> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
    >> boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0012_01BF8DBA.1A9132A0"
    >> X-Priority: 3
    >> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    >> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
    >> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
    >>
    >> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
    >>
    >> ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01BF8DBA.1A9132A0
    >> Content-Type: text/plain;
    >> charset="iso-8859-1"
    >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    >>
    >> Guy -  you need to unset for election to add a new vote center - thereby
    =
    >> clearing all the results so a Okay to clear precinct 102 on the memory =
    >> card in Sup functions seems more logical and less potentially =
    >> problematic to me.  IMHO
    >>
    >> Tari
    >>
    >>
    >>     -----Original Message-----
    >>     From: Ken Clark <ken@dieboldes.com>
    >>     To: rcr@dieboldes.com <rcr@dieboldes.com>
    >>     Date: Tuesday, March 14, 2000 12:52 PM
    >>     Subject: RE: ability to clear one precinct in a multiprecinct vote =
    >> center
    >>    =20
    >>    =20
    >>         From: owner-rcr@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-rcr@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of
    =
    >> Guy =20
    >>         =20
    >>         Would it be reasonable to download a new memory card designed to
    =
    >> count just the precinct in question?  This would imply selecting a =
    >> precinct for recount (as opposed to a race which is another common =
    >> recount requirement), clearing its counters (probably automatic), =
    >> downloading its memory card, recounting, and uploading the new count.=20
    >>    =20
    >>     Yes.  It is not just a matter of recounting a "precinct" though.  =
    >> Its recounting a precinct within a countergroup of an AccuVote in a =
    >> vcenter.  So the question is how to present this in GEMS.
    >>
    >>     Here is one solution.  Add a clear button to manual entry system.  =
    >> Probably a good idea anyway.  This allows the user to zero out a =
    >> memorycard/precinct/countergroup combination.  User then increases the =
    >> number of memory cards in the vcenter, and counts only those precincts =
    >> on the new card.  We already that part.
    >>
    >>     I would like to hear suggestions on how this could be made more =
    >> transparent though -- ie automatically clearing the recounted =
    >> memorycard/precinct/countergroup.  This still sounds far too easy to =
    >> screw up.
    >>
    >>     Ken
    >>
    >>     =20
    >>
    >>
    >> ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01BF8DBA.1A9132A0
    >> Content-Type: text/html;
    >> charset="iso-8859-1"
    >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    >>
    >> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
    >> <HTML>
    >> <HEAD>
    >>
    >> <META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
    >> http-equiv=3DContent-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 =
    >> Transitional//EN">
    >> <META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=3DGENERATOR>
    >> </HEAD>
    >> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
    >> <DIV><STRONG><FONT color=3D#800080 size=3D2>Guy -&nbsp; you need to =
    >> unset for=20
    >> election to add a new vote center - thereby clearing all the results so =
    >> a Okay=20
    >> to clear precinct 102 on the memory card in Sup functions seems more =
    >> logical and=20
    >> less potentially problematic to me.&nbsp; IMHO</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
    >> <DIV><STRONG><FONT color=3D#800080 size=3D2></FONT></STRONG>&nbsp;</DIV>
    >> <DIV><STRONG><FONT color=3D#800080 size=3D2>Tari</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
    >> <DIV><STRONG><FONT color=3D#800080 size=3D2></FONT></STRONG>&nbsp;</DIV>
    >> <DIV><STRONG><FONT color=3D#800080 size=3D2></FONT></STRONG>&nbsp;</DIV>
    >> <BLOCKQUOTE=20
    >> style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #800080 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT:
    =
    >> 5px">
    >>     <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><B>-----Original =
    >> Message-----</B><BR><B>From:=20
    >>     </B>Ken Clark &lt;<A=20
    >>     href=3D"mailto:ken@dieboldes.com";>ken@dieboldes.com</A>&gt;<BR><B>To: </B><A=20
    >>     href=3D"mailto:rcr@dieboldes.com";>rcr@dieboldes.com</A> &lt;<A=20
    >>     href=3D"mailto:rcr@dieboldes.com";>rcr@dieboldes.com</A>&gt;<BR><B>Date: =
    >> </B>Tuesday,=20
    >>     March 14, 2000 12:52 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>RE: ability to clear one =
    >> precinct=20
    >>     in a multiprecinct vote center<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
    >>     <BLOCKQUOTE=20
    >>     style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
    >> MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
    >>         <DIV align=3Dleft class=3DOutlookMessageHeader dir =3D ltr><FONT
    =
    >> size=3D2><FONT=20
    >>         face=3DTahoma><B>From:</B> <A=20
    >>         href=3D"mailto:owner-rcr@dieboldes.com";>owner-rcr@dieboldes.com</A> [<A=20
    >>         =
    >> href=3D"mailto:owner-rcr@dieboldes.com";>mailto:owner-rcr@dieboldes.com</A>]<B>On=20
    >>         Behalf Of </B>Guy&nbsp;<FONT face=3DArial><SPAN=20
    >>         =
    >> class=3D078413420-14032000>&nbsp;</SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
    >>         <DIV align=3Dleft class=3DOutlookMessageHeader dir =3D ltr><FONT
    =
    >> size=3D2><FONT=20
    >>         face=3DTahoma><FONT face=3DArial><SPAN=20
    >>         =
    >> class=3D078413420-14032000>&nbsp;</SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT><BR>Would =
    >> it=20
    >>         be reasonable to download a new memory card designed to count =
    >> just the=20
    >>         precinct in question?&nbsp; This would imply selecting a =
    >> precinct for=20
    >>         recount (as opposed to a race which is another common recount=20
    >>         requirement), clearing its counters (probably automatic), =
    >> downloading=20
    >>         its memory card, recounting, and uploading the new count.=20
    >> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
    >>     <P><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN =
    >> class=3D078413420-14032000><BR>Yes.&nbsp; It=20
    >>     is not just a matter of recounting a &quot;precinct&quot; =
    >> though.&nbsp; Its=20
    >>     recounting a precinct within a countergroup of an&nbsp;AccuVote in a
    =
    >>
    >>     vcenter.&nbsp; So the question is how to present this in=20
    >>     GEMS.</SPAN></FONT></P>
    >>     <P><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN class=3D078413420-14032000>Here
    =
    >> is one=20
    >>     solution</SPAN></FONT><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20
    >>     class=3D078413420-14032000>.&nbsp; Add a clear button to manual =
    >> entry=20
    >>     system.&nbsp; Probably a good idea anyway.&nbsp; This allows the =
    >> user to=20
    >>     zero out a memorycard/precinct/countergroup combination.&nbsp; User =
    >> then=20
    >>     increases the number of memory cards in the vcenter, and counts only
    =
    >> those=20
    >>     precincts on the new card.&nbsp; We already that =
    >> part.</SPAN></FONT></P>
    >>     <P><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN class=3D078413420-14032000>I =
    >> would like to=20
    >>     hear suggestions on how this could be made more transparent though =
    >> -- ie=20
    >>     automatically clearing the recounted =
    >> memorycard/precinct/countergroup.&nbsp;=20
    >>     This still sounds far too easy to screw up.</SPAN></FONT></P>
    >>     <P><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20
    >>     class=3D078413420-14032000>Ken</SPAN></FONT></P>
    >>     <P><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20
    >>     =
    >>
    class=3D078413420-14032000></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></=
    >> HTML>
    >>
    >> ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01BF8DBA.1A9132A0--
    >

- Prev by Date: RE: More vote center fields (was Fw: From Marin)
- Next by Date: RE: ability to clear one precinct in a multiprecinct vote center
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread