[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: Standard test deck

- To: <support@gesn.com>
- Subject: Re: Standard test deck
- From: "Tari Runyan" <trglobal@earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 12:45:03 -0700
- References: <3A6F38C0.B4BBCF97@earthlink.net>

    We have used an LA5 deck in Ca -  which is 1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5 etc -  there
    was a memo from Spectrum some time back outlining all the decks - I will try
    to find it or request Jeff or David to resend it .
    and yes  Certain states have certain LA requirements
    Tari

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Donald W. Biszmaier" <dbglobal@earthlink.net>
    To: "Support" <Support@gesn.com>
    Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 1:19 PM
    Subject: Standard test deck

    > In a conversation with David Dean at Global Printing the subject of a
    > standard test deck came up and I told him I would post something on the
    > support list.
    > An example was a test deck for a demo which contained approx 40 ballots
    > for what I would have considered 16 as needed.
    > Is the following fairly common or do some laws require something else?
    > 1 blank
    > 1 full
    > 1 first cand
    > 2 2nd cand
    > 3 3rd cand
    > 1 4th cand
    > 2 5th cand etc.
    > 1 all write in candidates
    > 1 overvote
    > * treat number of "vote for" as 1 cand.
    > "vote for two"
    > 1 first two cand
    > 2 second two cand. etc.
    > Thanks: Don B
    >

- References:
  - Standard test deck
    - From: "Donald W. Biszmaier" <dbglobal@earthlink.net>

- Prev by Date: Standard test deck
- Next by Date: RE: Standard test deck
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread