[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: AVTS 4.0.11 Vote for Two race - undervoted

- To: <support@gesn.com>
- Subject: Re: AVTS 4.0.11 Vote for Two race - undervoted
- From: "Steve Knecht" <skglobal@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 18:48:16 -0700
- References: <NDBBJBKEHMHBEPDMLKOLOEFHDEAA.ljdglobal@gesn.com>

Larry, undervotes have always been associated with "vote for 2" or more while the blank or no vote is to register just that. I wouldn't recommend that the RED be for anything other than BLANK voted races or you'll have alot of RED races in some elections and the summary screen will become useless.

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Larry Dix
> To: Support@gesn.com
> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 4:06 PM
> Subject: AVTS 4.0.11 Vote for Two race - undervoted

> I am trying to determine the intent of the summary screen identifying a non voted versus an under voted race.

> The summary screen will highlight a race in red when I fail to vote a race, indicating that I did not vote or under voted a race. When I have an option to vote for 2 and I only vote for one, the summary screen does not indicate that I under voted, it summarizes the one vote I selected. It does not highlight it in red.

> Was the intent to only show non voted races, or was it to indicate under voted races? If it was to show under voted races, I will submit this as a bug.

> Larry J. Dix

> Vice President of Operations

> Global Election Systems

- References:
  - AVTS 4.0.11 Vote for Two race - undervoted
    - From: "Larry Dix" <ljdglobal@gesn.com>

- Prev by Date: Re: AVTS 4.0.11 Vote for Two race - undervoted
- Next by Date: Re: AVTS 4.0.11 Vote for Two race - undervoted
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread