[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: Shadow Races with larger number of candidates defined results in incorrect # of ballots created for Automatic L&A Test

- To: <bugtrack@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: Re: Shadow Races with larger number of candidates defined results in incorrect # of ballots created for Automatic L&A Test
- From: "Talbot Iredale" <tiredale@dieboldes.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 10:11:45 -0700
- References: <ILEPKGHAJJOGKGEDPHDDAECBCEAA.ravina@dieboldes.com>

This has been fixed in GEMS 1-18-10.
This again was a problem with the determining number of siblings for a candidate not being limited to counting the candvgroups to the one race, therefore shadow race had an error.
Tab

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ravina Dhami
> To: bugtrack@dieboldes.com
> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 4:57 PM
> Subject: Shadow Races with larger number of candidates defined results in incorrect # of ballots created for Automatic L&A Test
> GEMS 1.18.9
> BS 4.3.2.1
> Automatic L&A Test
> If the ballot consists of a shadow race which has a larger number of candidates than the rest of the races defined then:
> 1. There is no blank ballot created for Automatic L&A Test
> 2. The passes are not recorded correctly. For Ex. shadow race has 5 candidates defined and all other races have 4 candidates. The 5th pass only creates 1 ballot and not 5.
> Ravina

- References:
  - Shadow Races with larger number of candidates defined results in incorrect # of ballots created for Automatic L&A Test
    - From: "Ravina Dhami" <ravina@dieboldes.com>

- Prev by Date: Re: Shadow Races - non-partisan candidates not appearing on ballots
- Next by Date: Re: Ballot Station v4.3.3 InsertCard.bmp not updated
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread