[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: GEMS 1-17-21: Base Precinct IDs are not unique within a report precinct.

- To: <bugtrack@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: Re: GEMS 1-17-21: Base Precinct IDs are not unique within a report precinct.
- From: "Tari Runyan" <trglobal@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 23:01:04 -0700
- References: <NFBBKABJOKDAFPKFEEKCOEDNCJAA.sophia@dieboldes.com>

I do not believe this is a bug as Julie moved these base precincts during Consolidation and did not add them
Tari

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Sophia Lee
> To: Bug Track
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 11:39 AM
> Subject: GEMS 1-17-21: Base Precinct IDs are not unique within a report precinct.
> When adding a new base precinct, its assigned base precinct ID does not automatically increment.
> For example,
> Report Precinct CON 101-01 has the following base precincts:
> SG001-01 1-10
> SG002-01 1-20
> ES001-01 1-30
> SG003-00 1-30
> SG002-02 1-30
> SG003-01 1-30
> ES001-00 1-40

- Follow-Ups:
  - RE: GEMS 1-17-21: Base Precinct IDs are not unique within a report precinct.
    - From: "Sophia Lee" <sophia@dieboldes.com>

- References:
  - GEMS 1-17-21: Base Precinct IDs are not unique within a report precinct.
    - From: "Sophia Lee" <sophia@dieboldes.com>

- Prev by Date: Re: BS 4.2.2 Headers being programmed on Ballot Station only withVotergroup1 attributes
- Next by Date: Fw: Pennsylvania cross-endorse certification Vote for 3
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread