[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: Separate Ovals - Thick Ovals

- To: <rcr@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: Re: Separate Ovals - Thick Ovals
- From: "Greg Forsythe" <gfglobal@earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 13:20:03 -0500
- Organization: Global Election Systems, Inc
- References: <NDBBLGPLOMMHOMJPHOIPEEJACFAA.tyler@dieboldes.com>

I thought they were, ask Nel.

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Tyler Links
> To: rcr@dieboldes.com
> Sent: November 10, 2000 12:16 PM
> Subject: RE: Separate Ovals - Thick Ovals

> It seems that the customers in question were not properly trained.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rcr@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-rcr@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Greg Forsythe
> Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 9:49 AM
> To: Request for Change
> Subject: Separate Ovals - Thick Ovals

> Please have thick ovals checked as a default when checking separate ovals. Second Request.

> The City of Hamilton has separate ovals printed in red but are not thick, the very purpose they were printed in red. Very difficult to see. They are using 160 Accu-Votes Monday with these thin red ovals.

> This is about the fifth election where this mistake has happened. Last year it was Langford, B.C.

> Greg Forsythe
> Global Election Systems, Inc
> 24 Hirondelle Place,
> Toronto, Ontario M3A 1V8
> Phone (416) 446-1383
> Fax (416) 446-1425
> gfglobal@earthlink.net www.dieboldes.com

- Follow-Ups:
  - Re: Separate Ovals - Thick Ovals
    - From: "Nel Finberg" <nel@dieboldes.com>

- References:
  - RE: Separate Ovals - Thick Ovals
    - From: "Tyler Links" <tyler@dieboldes.com>

- Prev by Date: RE: Separate Ovals - Thick Ovals
- Next by Date: GEMS 1.17.8 The California mandated 1% manual tally of AVTS ballot images
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread