[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: VReg totals does not add correctly in Card Cast report in GEMS-1-17-22 was( Decoding this Cards Cast Report)

- To: <bugtrack@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: Re: VReg totals does not add correctly in Card Cast report in GEMS-1-17-22 was( Decoding this Cards Cast Report)
- From: "Steve Knecht" <skglobal@earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 15:38:25 -0800
- References: <005901c1cc74$9cb27be0$1204a8c0@dpapushin>

Thanks Dmitry. Just FYI. It appears that they do like getting the REP/NOP and REP/REP in V1 and V2.

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Dmitry Papushin
> To: bugtrack@dieboldes.com
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 2:55 PM
> Subject: VReg totals does not add correctly in Card Cast report in GEMS-1-17-22 was( Decoding this Cards Cast Report)
> I'm taking this to bugtrack since some bugs have been reported in this e-mail.
> OK. I now have a vague idea of the report format. Based on review with Dmitry I believe the following are bugs:
> 1. Cards column should equal ballot column, given this was a single card per voter election.
> This is not a problem with the report, this is how cards-ballots related in the placer's database.
> 2. The Voters column does not add correctly on a TOTAL TOTAL ROW.
> This is fixed and will be in GEMS-1-17-23.
> 3. The polling vs absentee sections do not have the same format. See last nine rows of absentee (this is OK) and
> note how this is not reflected above for polling.
> This is fixed as well, GEMS-1-17-23 will not display counter group totals breaking by VGroup if there is only one VGroup record for District/Reportunit.
> Dmitry
> Unless I'm mistaken, if the bottom nine lines were replicated for the polling category, the report would work for the counties. That is they are trying to see how many cards were cast by party in each precinct. If this were done, I think you could leave off the
> VGroup2 colum altogether, fix the Cards/Ballots column, Fix the Voters totals lines and you'd have a usable report. I think this would reduce the existing 32 line report to 18 lines plus the final totals line (for the precinct in question). This may not work in written form very well.
> What do you think Soph?

> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Ken Clark
> > To: support@dieboldes.com
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 4:09 PM
> > Subject: RE: Decoding this Cards Cast Report

> > If it turns out there is a “better” way to present all of this information, post it a follow up and we’ll see what we can do for some future release. The report wasn’t obvious to me either when I looked at your screen shot.

> > Ken

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-support@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-support@dieboldes.com] On Behalf Of Steve Knecht
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 3:35 PM
> > To: support@dieboldes.com
> > Subject: Re: Decoding this Cards Cast Report

> > Sophia, thanks for the efforts on this. However, the format of this explanation is difficult for me to understand. So I'll call you. Thanks.

> > > ----- Original Message -----

> > > From: Sophia Lee

> > > To: support@dieboldes.com

> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 3:17 PM

> > > Subject: RE: Decoding this Cards Cast Report

> > > LINEs in REPORT MEANING (I think)
> > > CounterGroup VGroup1 VGroup2 Cast
> > > Polling TOTAL NOP 66 -> Total ballots cast for CounterGroup=Polling AND Vgroup2=NOP.
> > > 6(NOP NOP) + 46(DEM NOP) + 9(REP NOP) + 1(GRN NOP) + 4(AIP NOP) +
> > > 0(LIB NOP) + 0(REF NOP) + 0(NLP NOP)
> > > Polling REP TOTAL 79 -> Total ballots cast for CounterGroup=Polling AND Vgroup1=REP.
> > > 9(REP NOP) + 70(REP REP)
> > > Polling TOTAL TOTAL 136 -> Total ballots cast for CounterGroup=Polling
> > > 6(NOP NOP) + 46(DEM NOP) + 9(REP NOP) + 1(GRN NOP) + 4(AIP NOP) +
> > > 0(LIB NOP) + 0(REF NOP) + 0(NLP NOP) + 70(REP REP)
> > > Absentee/early TOTAL NOP 24 -> Total ballots cast for CounterGroup=Absentee/early AND Vgroup2=NOP
> > > 2(NOP NOP) + 21(DEM NOP) + 1(GRN NOP) + 0(AIP NOP) + 0(LIB NOP) 0 +
> > > 0 (REF NOP) + 0(NLP NOP)
> > > Absentee/early TOTAL REP 29 -> Total ballots cast for CounterGroup=Absentee/early AND Vgroup2=REP
> > > 29(REP REP)
> > > Absentee/early REP TOTAL 30 -> Total ballots cast for CounterGroup=Absentee/early AND Vgroup1=REP
> > > 1(REP NOP) + 29(REP REP)
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-support@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-support@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of
> > > Steve Knecht
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 6:18 PM
> > > To: Global Support
> > > Subject: Decoding this Cards Cast Report
> > > Could someone in support "decode" these columns for me and tell me what each
> > > one of them means. Thanks.
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Gary Smith <GSmith@placer.ca.gov>
> > > To: <skglobal@earthlink.net>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 12:14 PM
> > > Subject: Placer
> > > Steve:
> > > The cards cast report does not seem to be any different between versions. I
> > > installed the newest report set. Maybe it has to do with the way we have
> > > our counter groups setup? Having a separate counter group for the Rep NP.
> > > I sent a scanned copy of the report, cards cast.tif. It should open with
> > > standard image viewing software (imagevue) that comes with windows. It is
> > > in the accessories folder.
> > > Gary

- References:
  - VReg totals does not add correctly in Card Cast report in GEMS-1-17-22 was( Decoding this Cards Cast Report)
    - From: "Dmitry Papushin" <dmitry@dieboldes.com>

- Prev by Date: Spyrus units going down -March 2002
- Next by Date: Re: Spyrus units going down -March 2002
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread