[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# RE: AVTS Accumulation Audit Log

- To: <rcr@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: RE: AVTS Accumulation Audit Log
- From: "Don Vopalensky" <don@dieboldes.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 14:43:55 -0700
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <017e01c208d9$ab2b9200$1404a8c0@TIredale>

    It does not print all actions when in accumulator mode.  Try and upload a
    PCMCIA card twice.  It comes up with a message that states that this card is
    already uploaded.  Do you wish to over right.  Texas requires this to be
    logged.  It doesn't log this action or the message that was created.  They
    say they have to have all actions that the poll worker did, and messages and
    actions that took place during the accumulation process.

    -----Original Message-----
    From: owner-rcr@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-rcr@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Talbot
    Iredale
    Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:31 PM
    To: rcr@dieboldes.com
    Subject: Re: AVTS Accumulation Audit Log

    Don,

        First, as my previous e-mail stated, the 4.1.11 does print the logs to
    the internal printer when in the Accumulator, so what are the outstanding
    issues.

        Secondly, if we did a new release of the 4.1 series BallotStation it
    would be 4.1.12 in accordance with corporate policy established last year.
    If Texas would not require "4.1.11.1" (which would be different that 4.1.11)
    then why would they not accept "4.1.12", since the changes would be
    identical?

    Tab

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Don Vopalensky" <don@dieboldes.com>
    To: <rcr@dieboldes.com>
    Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:09 PM
    Subject: RE: AVTS Accumulation Audit Log

    > Tab, yes, it needs to print on the R-6 internal printer and should also
    > print to the internal log.  It definitely needs to print to the internal
    > printer.  4.1.11 is what was presented to Texas for certification.  They
    > require ITA certification.  Could we not make a 4.1.11.1 for Texas since
    > they are the only state that requires this.  Hopefully Texas would be ok
    > with this since ITA does not require this feature, and does not test for
    > this feature.
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: owner-rcr@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-rcr@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Talbot
    > Iredale
    > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 9:30 AM
    > To: rcr@dieboldes.com
    > Subject: Re: AVTS Accumulation Audit Log
    >
    >
    > Don,
    >
    >     Do you mean by "Log" that it needs to actually print the entry on the
    > internal printer or just record it in the internal log?
    >
    >     Also what do you mean by "this must work with the 4.1.11 firmware"?
    If
    > we make any changes to the software then by definition it is not 4.1.11.
    >
    > Tab
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: "Don Vopalensky" <don@dieboldes.com>
    > To: <rcr@dieboldes.com>
    > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:07 AM
    > Subject: AVTS Accumulation Audit Log
    >
    >
    > > Jurisdiction:  Texas Certification
    > > Date requested:  May 29, 2002
    > > Date needed:  August 15, 2002
    > >
    > > When using a AVTS to do accumulation in the precinct, that AVTS must log
    > all
    > > poll worker actions and messages that have taken place on that
    > accumulation
    > > unit.  This must work with the 4.1.11 firmware.
    > >
    > >
    >

- References:
  - Re: AVTS Accumulation Audit Log
    - From: "Talbot Iredale" <tiredale@dieboldes.com>

- Prev by Date: Re: Audit Log Printer Function
- Next by Date: RE: AVTS Accumulation Audit Log
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread