[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: Alaska Ballot Question SB76

- To: "John McLaurin" <asailsman@earthlink.net>, <support@gesn.com>
- Subject: Re: Alaska Ballot Question SB76
- From: "Talbot Iredale" <tiredale@gesn.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 15:55:54 -0700

John,
You are right. This should be setup as two question Plan A and Plan B.
Tab
>Support,
>
>In questioning the Division the following correspondence took place. Please refer to Senate Bill 76 at www.legis.state.ak.us
>Question to Support: Does Gail need to take any special steps in GEMS to create, accumulate and report this type of ballot question or is it standard ballot layout and election programming?
>
>Thanks in advance for your assistance.
>
>Gail wrote: You've got it right.
>John McLaurin wrote:
>> If I understand the situation, if we were to put this question on the ballot via GEMS it would take the outline of: one question, two sections with ability to vote yes or no on one or both questions. GEMS would then have to show accumulate and show results of both questions. Do I have it right in my mind?
>>
>> I envision a simple ballot with Plan A Yes or No and Plan B yes or no. Or is it more complicated?
>

- Prev by Date: Alaska Ballot Question SB76
- Next by Date: AccuVote-TS & AccuVote
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread