[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# RE: BS Audit Log Upload - 22 month archiving

- To: <rcr@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: RE: BS Audit Log Upload - 22 month archiving
- From: "Ken Clark" <ken@dieboldes.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 13:23:45 -0700
- Importance: Normal
- In-Reply-To: <00d401c15d8e$f1f9be60$0ad8fc9e@default>

> From: owner-rcr@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-rcr@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Steve Knecht
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:23 PM

> > From: Ken Clark
> > To: rcr@dieboldes.com
> > Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 10:52 AM
> > Subject: RE: BS Audit Log Upload - 22 month archiving
> > It is also going to increase (potentially double) the upload time for each vote center.
> > I don't see it as part of the election night upload, but rather as an upload of the audit during the canvass period where you have 10-29 days to get the "official" results.

Not practical, IMO.
One of the key advantages to the GEMS design is that there isn't a "canvas" or even "test" phases. You upload, you print reports, you go home. They are all the same administratively.
You are talking about is new tools upload just upload the audit logs, reports and administrative dialogs to track which audit logs are uploaded and which are not, and whether they are in sync with the latest ballots uploaded. Not to mention the fact that the time you really want the log to find out what the hell went wrong is election night.
Its gotta ride with the ballots, or not at all.
Ken

- Follow-Ups:
  - Re: BS Audit Log Upload - 22 month archiving
    - From: "Nel Finberg" <nel@dieboldes.com>

- References:
  - Re: BS Audit Log Upload - 22 month archiving
    - From: "Steve Knecht" <skglobal@earthlink.net>

- Prev by Date: Re: BS Audit Log Upload - 22 month archiving
- Next by Date: Re: BS Audit Log Upload - 22 month archiving
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread