[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# RE: Ballot Layout on AVTS units

- To: "Support Team (E-mail)" <support@gesn.com>
- Subject: RE: Ballot Layout on AVTS units
- From: "Ken Clark" <ken@gesn.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 13:43:53 -0500
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <01BF1AFC.D6BACB70@sdn-ar-001neomahP307.dialsprint.net>

    > Are we going to have the AVTS system layout ballots similiar to
    > paper, ie:
    > Front 3 columns & Back 1 column.

    Yes.  We also need to support the placement options like next column,
    multiple headers per race set, column headers, block width for races and
    headers, multiple spacing, draw options, you name it.  The problem is that
    the IMARK ballot layout was never designed to handle this, and needs to be
    re-written.

    This is also the correct answer to the "AVTS - Issue large than a column or
    page" bug you just posted.  The text should not wrap -- it should take
    multiple columns.

    > Should I make this a RCR or is there something already in place.

    It never hurts to file the RCR, but understand that there is a huge list of
    features that are implicitly expected from the rewrite.  For example, an
    AccuBasic interpreter.  There are no formal RCRs for any of these, but they
    are all in the plan.  This isn't really so much a "Request For Change" as a
    "Request To Start Over".

    Ken

- References:
  - Ballot Layout on AVTS units
    - From: Jeff Hintz <jhglobal@earthlink.net>

- Prev by Date: Ballot Layout on AVTS units
- Next by Date: Install Problem for AVTSIS NOMDAC 3-10-11
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread