[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: Red as a second colour

- To: ken@dieboldes.com
- Subject: Re: Red as a second colour
- From: "Ian S. Piper" <ian@dieboldes.com>
- Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1999 17:24:19 -0600
- CC: Greg Forsythe <jgforsyt@netcom.ca>, Rcr@dieboldes.com
- References: <003901be5154$22b0d6f0$6503a8c0@cramden.dieboldes.com>

    Ken Clark wrote:

    > > > I've never seen a red oval printout, but I think what Greg is
    > > > looking for is a
    > > > way to take a separate red oval printout (which is just a
    > > > printout of ovals, no
    > > > text I guess) and have some identification on that oval printout
    > > > which allows
    > > > the print shop to match it to the actual ballot layout text.
    > >
    > > This feature will be in the next version of GEMS.  Its a 5 minute change.
    > > Sorry for the confusion Greg.
    >
    > I spoke too fast (and I have put away the clue hammer).
    >
    > Whitman informs me that we print the card identification text outside the
    > cut marks on the oval plate already, so printers have the means to match up
    > the plates.  Greg just put that in the rcr to throw me (us) off...
    >
    > Ken

    Hi Greg:

    If the id is printed on the red oval template, then why did you post the rcr?

    Ian

- References:
  - RE: Red as a second colour
    - From: "Ken Clark" <ken@dieboldes.com>

- Prev by Date: RE: Red as a second colour
- Next by Date: Re: Red as a second colour
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread