[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# RE: Central Count Error Messages

- To: <bugtrack@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: RE: Central Count Error Messages
- From: "Ken Clark" <ken@dieboldes.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 14:52:58 -0600
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <006e01bf848a$0dfe8300$20f6f7d1@stevek.dieboldes.com>

> I am running 2.00g firmware. I guess the "adjusted the timing mark signal filtering" may be working in that I may be getting fewer than I would have prior to the adjustment, however, I'd say I'm getting a 5-7% rate on these or roughly 10 to 15 times per input tray of 150 to 200 ballots. This seems a bit much to me.

Indeed. How many machines? Are all machines behaving equally badly? If so you might think about sending a deck of failed ballots up to Vancouver after the election to try to track this down.
Ken

- References:
  - Re: Central Count Error Messages
    - From: "Steve Knecht" <skglobal@earthlink.net>

- Prev by Date: Re: Central Count Error Messages
- Next by Date: RE: Central Count Error Messages
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread